Dedicated servers from € 9.99

A regular server is usually better for websites, databases, Docker, VPN, proxies, bots, CRM systems, and hosting projects. A GPU server is needed when the workload is focused on the graphics card itself: machine learning, rendering, computer vision, streaming, and graphics processing. If you do not need a GPU all the time, there is no reason to overpay just for the word GPU.

Yes. Telegram bots usually do not require an expensive server. Stable networking, a proper disk, predictable load, and the ability to configure the environment quickly are more important. If the bot works with AI, video, OCR, or heavy analytics, then a stronger configuration or even a GPU may be needed.

If you run a regular website, bot, VPN, small service, or test environment, a VPS is often enough. If you need full hardware control, high stability, more resources, specific low-level tuning, or your own stack without neighbors, you need a dedicated server. If the workload is bottlenecked by graphics acceleration, then a GPU server is the right fit. The most common mistake is choosing a dedicated server where a VPS would have been enough, or trying to fit serious production into a weak VPS.

Yes. For most workloads we recommend Ubuntu LTS or other Linux systems. Linux is usually chosen for Docker, web projects, proxies, VPN, Telegram bots, CI/CD, monitoring, databases, and administration without unnecessary overhead. For long-term and predictable operation, Ubuntu LTS releases are usually the most practical choice.

Yes. If you need RDP, Windows software, 1C, specialized corporate applications, or a Windows environment for remote work, a server with Windows Server can be selected. But it is important to understand the task in advance: for a simple I just want Windows scenario, customers often choose a more expensive configuration than they really need.

Yes, and in most cases that is the correct choice. For server workloads it makes more sense to use Windows Server instead of Windows 10. Windows Server is better for continuously running services, RDP access, server roles, licensing, and administration. Windows 10 is usually chosen only for very narrow use cases where a desktop environment is specifically required.

Usually yes, if your project requires a specific version. But choosing an older version only out of habit is not a good approach. The Windows Server version should be selected based on software compatibility, licensing requirements, and update support. If the application works correctly on a newer release, it is usually better not to stay on older builds.

In a normal production environment, almost never. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are no longer current choices for new projects, and Windows Server 2003 is long obsolete. These versions should be considered only if you run legacy software that cannot be migrated and you fully understand the limitations. For new projects, this is a poor choice.

If you run websites, APIs, databases, Docker, control panels, Telegram bots, VPN, Node.js, Python, PHP, proxies, or DevOps workloads, Linux is almost always the better option. If you need RDP, .NET in a familiar Windows environment, 1C, or Windows-specific software, then Windows Server makes sense. A common mistake is choosing Windows without a real reason and then paying more for licenses and resources.

Yes. A server can be used for a remote work environment, RDP access, internal services, CRM systems, file systems, accounting software, and corporate applications. But first it is important to understand what exactly you plan to run: office workloads, 1C, browser-heavy sessions, multiple concurrent users, or heavier software. The right configuration depends on that.

Yes. For many projects this is a standard scenario: renting a server abroad for geography, latency, hosting requirements, international services, or infrastructure separation. If Europe matters to your project, it is better to choose the location based on your target audience rather than taking the first cheaper server you see.

Yes, you can choose servers on Intel Xeon and other CPU lines depending on the task. Xeon is usually selected for stable around-the-clock workloads, virtualization, databases, containers, and production use. If your project depends heavily on per-core frequency, it is often smarter to look not at the big name but at the exact model and the balance between clock speed, core count, and storage.

Yes, and for most workloads it is no longer an option but the standard. If you run websites, control panels, CRM systems, databases, bots, APIs, or Windows RDP, SSD gives noticeably better responsiveness than older HDD storage. HDD still makes sense only where capacity matters more than speed.

Yes. With a dedicated server, not only the hardware and price matter, but also management access: reboot, OS reinstall, monitoring, and remote console. This is exactly what separates a proper server service from a black box where you depend on support tickets for every small action.

The price depends not on the word server itself, but on the configuration and the workload: CPU, RAM, SSD or NVMe, GPU, uplink, location, Windows license, administration, and additional IPs. That is why the question how much does a server cost without context is rarely useful. The real price depends on what your project actually needs.

Yes. To choose a server without overpaying, five inputs are usually enough: what you are going to run, which operating system you need, how many users or processes will work simultaneously, whether a GPU is required, and which location is the priority. After that it becomes possible to recommend a configuration for the actual workload instead of guessing from a search phrase.